truehobbit
blithe and bonny
Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8872
Location: back in the land of make-believe
|
Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 3:10 am |
     |
|
Good article on The Times Online today, detailing the extent of the probable loss in historic documents.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article5846343.ece
(I have to admit I don't understand it, though - what water? and how can a pile of rubble do so much harm to papers?
I'm also wondering if the emergency measures were done properly, as search for the missing people never seems to have got really underway. Would be so like this city to mess that sort of thing up. ) |
|
 |
Just 'cos I like this pic so much.
(Thanks to Rowan for taking it. )
Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.
(LOTR, the musical)
...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion
(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
My new food & restaurant blog
 |
|
|
|
|
Storyteller
Ranger of the North
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 4437
|
Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 2:56 pm |
     |
|
The elections and related stuff no longer dominate the headlines in Israel, but the fun continues.
The National Fraud Unit has declared that they have sufficient evidence to prosecute Prime Minister Ehud Olmert for fraud and breach of trust over the 1998 Israel Investments Center affair. Two other indictments are already pending judiciary hearing. (Better late than never, I say).
Yigal Amir, the killer of the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, is making headlines yet
again
- he has filed an appeal against the court decision to ban him from making phone calls. The ban was imposed after Amir after he gave a phone interview to the media, in violation of the terms of his sentence.
Sallai Meridor, Israeli ambassador to the US, has announced his intention to quit his post, apparently because he believes that "it is fitting and proper that the new Government will have the opportunity to appoint, immediately upon its formation, the man or woman of its choosing as Ambassador to Washington." Less apparent reasons are rumored to involve him being asked by one of the Israeli government officials to leave the room during a meeting with US officials.
Admiral Eli Merom, the Chinese-Israeli commander of the Israeli Navy whose appointment I've mentioned here before, has found himself in hot water after having been spotted in a Tel-Aviv strip club. The media are having a feast, and both the army and the public are furious, since the army officers are supposed to be "role models" for the rest of the society. Two female Brigadier Generals have already spoken against Marom, and many are demanding his resignation or demotion.
(I've mentioned this story to a British friend of mine, and her reaction was: "You have women generals?" |
|
|
|
|
|
truehobbit
blithe and bonny
Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8872
Location: back in the land of make-believe
|
Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:06 pm |
     |
|
15 killed in a shooting at a school in south Germany today.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7937554.stm
I've thought before that teacher is probably the job most likely to get you violently killed, right after police officer.  |
|
 |
Just 'cos I like this pic so much.
(Thanks to Rowan for taking it. )
Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.
(LOTR, the musical)
...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion
(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
My new food & restaurant blog
 |
|
|
|
|
truehobbit
blithe and bonny
Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8872
Location: back in the land of make-believe
|
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:57 pm |
     |
|
So, investigators are now dealing with a possibly forged internet 'announcement' of the deed and no end of copycat "pranksters", who think announcing to repeat the events is a fun way to get your school closed...
Well, these pranksters, when identified, get arrested and face appropriate punishment - but just how callous and plain deficient in any human sense do you have to be to do such a thing? It boggles the mind.  |
|
 |
Just 'cos I like this pic so much.
(Thanks to Rowan for taking it. )
Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.
(LOTR, the musical)
...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion
(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
My new food & restaurant blog
 |
|
|
|
|
vison
She-Devil
Alliance: Fangorn
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 9888
|
Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:34 pm |
     |
|
Storyteller said:
The elections and related stuff no longer dominate the headlines in Israel, but the fun continues.
The National Fraud Unit has declared that they have sufficient evidence to prosecute Prime Minister Ehud Olmert for fraud and breach of trust over the 1998 Israel Investments Center affair. Two other indictments are already pending judiciary hearing. (Better late than never, I say).
Yigal Amir, the killer of the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, is making headlines yet
again
- he has filed an appeal against the court decision to ban him from making phone calls. The ban was imposed after Amir after he gave a phone interview to the media, in violation of the terms of his sentence.
Sallai Meridor, Israeli ambassador to the US, has announced his intention to quit his post, apparently because he believes that "it is fitting and proper that the new Government will have the opportunity to appoint, immediately upon its formation, the man or woman of its choosing as Ambassador to Washington." Less apparent reasons are rumored to involve him being asked by one of the Israeli government officials to leave the room during a meeting with US officials.
Admiral Eli Merom, the Chinese-Israeli commander of the Israeli Navy whose appointment I've mentioned here before, has found himself in hot water after having been spotted in a Tel-Aviv strip club. The media are having a feast, and both the army and the public are furious, since the army officers are supposed to be "role models" for the rest of the society. Two female Brigadier Generals have already spoken against Marom, and many are demanding his resignation or demotion.
(I've mentioned this story to a British friend of mine, and her reaction was: "You have women generals?"
Oh, Storyteller.
I thought the strangest thing I ever heard of was a Chinese-Newfoundlander who talked like a Newfoundlander and ran a - wait for it - Chinese laundry.
But who can top a Chinese-Israeli naval commander with a penchant for watching civilian gals take their clothes off? While I am not myself a big fan of strip clubs, it seems to me that the naval guys I knew in days of yore would be rather proud of an officer with such manly tastes. And the rest of us, we non-military types, we don't expect these guys to be role models "for society". what? I expect that some men, particularly men who spend their days doing military stuff, are prone to engaging in risque rather than risky behavior.
Tempest in a teapot. |
|
|
Dwight Eisenhower said:
"Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed. This world in arms is not spending money alone. It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children. This is not a way of life at all in any true sense. Under the clouds of war, it is humanity hanging on a cross of iron."
|
|
|
|
|
Lord_Morningstar
Mariner
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 01 Sep 2010
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7417
Location: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:31 am |
     |
|
Anna Bligh’s Labor Government has (against expectations) been comfortably returned in Queensland, still holding 56 of 89 seats. Pauline Hanson’s political career is over – she only won about 20% of the vote in the seat she ran in.
I still think it all goes back to Peter Beattie, Premier from 1998-2007. He must be just about the best politician I’ve ever seen. Queensland was virtually a conservative fiefdom for decades, and in the space of about three years he completely and utterly destroyed conservatism as an organised political force in Australia’s most conservative state. It would be like a Liberal Democrat running for office in Texas, sweeping out half of the Republican legislators and replacing them with abortion, gun control and gay marriage advocates. Since the 2001 wipeout, the conservatives have doubled the number of seats they hold in the state parliament, but it still hasn’t bought them anywhere near government.
It’s also notable for being the first time that a woman has led a party to an election victory at a state level in Australia. It also saw the defeat of Australia’s last One Nation Party MP, ending that party’s eventful decade-long history. |
|
|
|
|
|
truehobbit
blithe and bonny
Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8872
Location: back in the land of make-believe
|
Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:28 pm |
     |
|
Wow, I dug this up from the third page - no posts since March.
Looks like we haven't been bored with US politics since the new presidency got under way...
Bumping this, because we're having a general election tomorrow, so here's a bit about the current political situation in Germany and the outlooks and problems for this election.
The current government, under the direction of Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU), is a coalition between conservatives (CDU) and social democrats/labour (SPD). These being the two major parties in this country, this is called a 'grand coalition'.
We're having a grand coalition because for some time now, either in general or local elections, none of the great parties has been getting a decisive enough majority to rule even with the help of a minor party.
Merkel is standing for re-election, and up until a few weeks ago it looked as if none of the two parties was making any particular effort in campaigning because seemingly even they themselves were taking it for granted that the grand coalition should be continued.
All of a sudden now, though, they have officially announced they don't want to continue in coalition, with the CDU announcing it was going for a coalition with the free trade capitalists (FDP).
This seems to show a sudden confidence in material gains for the FDP, which I personally find scary. (They usually hover around 10%.)
SPD can traditionally go into coalition with the Greens, but no one really seems to expect this to be enough (strange, really, as Greens tend to be about as strong as FDP and SPD as strong as CDU - so, in a way, they are just a lot less confident than their opponents, and that is a bit worrying, too) - anyway, they seem to assume a third coalition partner would be needed, and they have a problem there.
With SPD, just like British Labour, having made a development away from their traditional "workers' interest party" to a more centric position, the gap on the left has been filled by a new party that goes by the telling name "The Left". They want financial security for the poor by charging the rich, which sounds good so far (to my mind), except that they do use communist catchwords a bit too often to be trusted. Initially derided and decried, therefore, as the party of those hopeless die-hards who want the former East German system back, this party has made great gains in votes in a short time, making established parties re-think their initial disdain, and SPD has had to change its mantra from "absolutely no co-operation with "The Left" ever!" to something more like "um, yeah, maybe, dunno, we'll see".
An undecidedness which I have to say hasn't made a very good impression on me. Added to that, they decided on a candidate for the chancellorship who seemed to be a big nobody. Franz-Walter Steinmeier, though having a lot of merits from a long political career of course, has never been someone to have been particularly noticeable before having been put forward as a candidate. It's really only been in last few weeks that you might have started thinking "hey, he
talks
!"
Some main problems facing the new government are really not so much the current economic crisis (though made worse by it, of course), but a bunch of basic internal problems that have been riddling politics for something like a decade now. Problems that each new government tried to solve with some reform or other, which only seems to have led to making the problem worse, including health insurance, pension funding, the tax burden and unemployment aid.
So, confidence in the big parties is as low as it can get, reflected also in the results of the previous general election, that had CDU at 35%, SPD at 34%.
FDP had 10%, Greens 8% and The Left 9%. (Numbers rounded).
If recent local elections are anything to go by, this trend is still continuing, so if not another grand coalition there'd have to be one of three parties.
I think Merkel has done a fairly good job, and especially abroad has been successful enough. Her new-found love for the FDP, though, makes me wonder what we'd be in for. The most worrying aspect about this is that both support continuing using nuclear energy.
As far as I'm concerned, none of them addresses any of the problems that concern me most closely (with conservatives working mostly for the benefit of families with kids, capitalists for that of businesses, socialists for those of workers and greens for those of immigrants), so I guess whoever I vote for doesn't make much of a difference for me.
Participation in the election will be interesting, too. |
|
 |
Just 'cos I like this pic so much.
(Thanks to Rowan for taking it. )
Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.
(LOTR, the musical)
...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion
(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
My new food & restaurant blog
 |
|
|
|
|
elfshadow
Ringbearer
Alliance: Stewards of Gondor
Last Visited: 13 Aug 2010
Joined: 19 Dec 2003
Posts: 13815
Location: C to the olorado
|
Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:55 pm |
     |
|
I've been reading some articles about the German elections, Hobby, so I'm glad you decided to post on it! I'm getting so tired of US politics (and I'm an American) so it's really interesting to learn about another country's elections--and Germany's are so important.
If you wouldn't mind, do you think you could delve a little bit more into the political leanings of each of the major parties? It's hard to know exactly how "right" one of your parties are, since I think the US tends to be more conservative overall so "right" and "left" have slightly different connotations.
What do you think would be the ideal government for Germany?
Apologies for this American's ignorance of German politics.  |
|
|
|
|
|
truehobbit
blithe and bonny
Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8872
Location: back in the land of make-believe
|
Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:57 pm |
     |
|
Election results (rounded again, can't be bothered with the commas as long as they don't make a decisive difference ):
CDU: 34% (second lowest result ever)
SPD: 23% (an all-time record low)
FDP: 15%
Greens: 11%
Left: 12%
Participation was at a record low at 72%.
Merkel will continue as chancellor, this time in coalition with the liberals.
So:
elsha, thanks! And your questions don't sound ignorant at all. Besides, I'm rather ignorant about the US system myself, so I can't do too much comparison, I'll just try to describe things as they are here.
(From my own perspective, of course, and without claiming completeness. )
You're quite right about the US being more conservative, I think. Your 'socialist' president is about as socialist as our chancellor, who belongs to the conservative party.
So, basically, we have two main parties, too.
The Social Democratic Party (SPD) dates back to the mid-19th century. Workers, then largely without rights, combined to stand up for their rights following socialist ideas.
Traditionally, then, this party stands for
- protecting workers' rights against employers
- imposing government checks on businesses
- legislating social aid and welfare services
- equal opportunities irrespective of birth, wealth, gender etc
Since the 1990s, this party has re-defined itself along the lines of Blair's Labour party in the UK. It seemed at the time that the concept of the "worker" as it had existed in the 19th century was dying out, and that we'd soon all be highly skilled employees in the service industry, and that "flexibility" was the magic word to create well-being for everyone, which of course means giving more leeway to entrepreneurs' ideas at the expense of the classic state-regulation.
The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) was founded right after the war, but could be said to be based on a 19th century party called "Centre", which as the name says, wanted to represent the citizens at the centre of society (in opposition to the socialist workers' representation).
Traditionally, then, this party stands for
- preserving traditional values, e.g. giving preference to standard families as opposed to other forms of co-habitation
- supporting private initiative, from business enterprise to education, which also means leaving more of the social aid responsibility to the individual rather than the state
- making sure that citizens don't feel the status quo threatened
- in foreign policy loyalty to western alliance partners
In recent years, this party has tried to address a wider spectrum of society and accomodate new ways of life in addition to the traditional values as well as reassure the lower classes that individual responsibility is not its only welfare-concept.
Because of that, the two parties have both started to claim they represent the 'middle' of society, and have become almost indistinguishable apart from their stance on foreign politics and some more marginal civic rights points.
This, I think, is largely responsible for the outcome of this election.
As we have a representative voting system, other parties can succeed in getting into 'parliament' (for lack of a better general term) too.
The oldest of the smaller parties is the Liberal (Freiheitlich) Democratic Party (FDP), founded right after the war, too.
They promote 'liberty' in the sense that they stand for
- the state largely keeping out of the private and business affairs of people, i.e. individual responsibility for your own well-being rather than state-regulated welfare and a minimum of legal restrictions of businesses
- personal liberty in choosing ways of life for yourself
In the late 70s, new problems emerged which these parties didn't seem to address properly. To fill this gap, the "Green" party was founded.
They stand for
- protection of the environment
- protection and enlargement of civic rights, esp with respect to immigrants
- new party structures to ensure democracy, as the structures of the classic parties were seen as undemocratic and hierarchic
- no violence
- enlarging personal rights in the sense of abolishing obstacles to new ways of life as seen to be posed by traditional values
After the re-unification, they merged with the East German civic rights movement, changed their name slightly, and strengthened the civic and personal rights and social equality aspects of their program at the expense of the environmental ones.
Lastly, there's a new emerging party, called "The Left". This was created by merging a party that was established in east Germany after the re-unification with the aim to re-instate socialist ideas and a west German party founded by a prominent politician formely of the SPD who left that party when it drifted towards the middle. In its current form it was only started two years ago, and it stands for
- ensuring sufficient welfare and equal chances by taxing wealth, capping income and removing educational obstacles
- regulating businesses to prevent speculation at the expense of employees
- no involvement in foreign conflicts
As can be seen, these are really the original aims of the SPD, which IMO explains the speedy success of this party, esp in a time of economic crisis.
(There are a lot of smaller parties, of course, but they are partly only important locally, partly never make it to enough votes to have someone in parliament, so I'm leaving them out here.)
As to what I'd think would be the ideal government, that's of course a question of my personal political leanings.
Personally, I'm very much for regulating businesses and the economy, and protecting the environment, but I'm also for keeping traditional rules and values.
Whatever government we get, though, I hope that our constitution protects us from the market-liberalism that riddles the US economy. There's a paragraph in the constitution that says it's the state's responsibility to protect the welfare of the citizens, so it would be unconstitutional for the FDP to press for abolishing all regulation of the economy. Though it'll be interesting how far they'll go. As far as I'm concerned, de-regulation of the workplace isn't likely to affect me much personally, and if private responsibility is strengthened that might even be good for me as far as pensions are concerned.
The worst threat from the new government, I fear, is to the environment, as plans to end the use of nuclear energy are pretty much scrapped now, and de-regulating private enterprise of course is bound to hurt nature even before it starts hurting people.
Ah well. Wait and see, eh?  |
|
 |
Just 'cos I like this pic so much.
(Thanks to Rowan for taking it. )
Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.
(LOTR, the musical)
...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion
(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
My new food & restaurant blog
 |
|
|
|
|
Democritus
Ranger of the North
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 26 Aug 2010
Joined: 08 Aug 2001
Posts: 4976
|
Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:19 pm |
     |
|
That is an interesting assessment of the German political parties Truehobbit, thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
truehobbit
blithe and bonny
Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8872
Location: back in the land of make-believe
|
Posted: Mon Nov 2, 2009 3:23 pm |
     |
|
Thanks, Demo.
Well, the coalition contract is signed, the ministries are all filled, the new government can get started.
When I walked into a local wine shop last weekend where the shop-owner and a bunch of friends were hanging around as usual, I caught someone saying, "isn't it great? A young nobleman to lead the army, and finances is in a wheelchair already..." - loved that.
Not being the greatest expert in politics myself I have to say that there are a bunch of names filling the offices now that I've never heard of before, and those that I knew took me rather by surprise.
So, yes,
zu
Guttenberg is changing from Finances, which he'd taken over at the height of the recent crisis, and in which, for what reason I don't know (though maybe because he looks smart and sleek), he seems to have made an excellent impression, getting the highest ratings in opinion polls, to Defense, which, in this country, is not something that is going to win you any Brownie points in public opinion, so I wonder why he wanted it.
He's a member of the CSU (which I didn't mention in my previous post - in Federal politics they are the right wing appendix of the CDU, and the traditionally dominant party in arch-conservative Bavaria).
Finances is taken over by Schäuble, who before had been Minister of the Interior. He's in a wheelchair since having been the victim of an assassination attempt almost 20 years ago. An experience which might well explain and excuse his paranoid attitude to security, but which also, I believe, made him responsible for a number of scary motions undermining civic liberties in this country, and although I don't know what qualifies him for the finance department, I have to say that it's at least a small relief to have him gone from the post of Interior Minister. I hardly know anything about the new minister in that office.
The last choice curious enough (to me) to mention is that of Westerwelle as Foreign Minister.
All through the last decade, he's led the FDP, struggling for its rise to power, and, more often than not, making somewhat of a fool of himself.
I'm not saying he doesn't have what it takes to make a good representative of our country abroad - for ought I know he might - the thing is just that I'm only used to seeing him look silly at the head of a minor party no one used to take particularly seriously.
(Though, hey, maybe dealing with an openly gay foreign minister is going to be something new for politicians of some countries... )
As to the politics decided in the new coaltion:
It seems like the first and easiest thing to be scrapped was the previous government's decision to end the peaceful use of nuclear energy and switch off all nuclear power plants by 2020 - they can now run on indefinitely, having to put some of their profits after that into research on renewable energy and storage for nuclear waste.
Personally, I think, Westerwelle & Co. should by this contract have agreed to have the nuclear waste stored in their own backyard, maybe that might have made them see the problem...
Another decision, I have to admit though, is something I completely agree with: the assets you are allowed to retain while receiving social welfare have been raised considerably.
The problem here is that most social welfare ideas stem from socialist and social democratic policies and it seems to be wired into their system that society consists of two groups: the comfortably off bourgeoisie and the possessionless prolatariat. To protect the latter has always been the (laudable) object of the left.
These days, however, we get to see more and more often that people start out comfortably well off and then lose income...
For social democrat welfare ideas, however, you had to fit their image - i.e. be destitute - in order to receive welfare. That's why, in this country, you are not eligible for welfare as long as you have capital assets left.
The fact that these assets might be a person's provision for old age in a time where the state itself admits to not be able to provide for everybody in old age and asks people to take their own steps to secure income in later life hasn't, it seems, struck social democrat policies as a contradiction yet. It used to mean that anyone who takes a fall from financial security to dependency on welfare would be forced to become destitute first, meaning that they would probably remain on welfare in later life.
So, now you are allowed to retain a much larger proportion of your personal savings and receive welfare nevertheless.
There are also some plans on tax relief, but I won't be able to say what I think of these before I find out whether they benefit me personally.
In foreign policy, the government is intent on fulfilling its obligations to its alliance partners, which, first and foremost, means staying involved in Afghanistan.
This is an unpopular thing over here, but, personally again, I think it's the right thing to do. I don't know why things are so messed up in that conflict, or whether there's any chance at all to win it, but I do think that as Germans in particular we have a moral duty to help eradicate this renewed dictatorship of inhumanity and depravity.
The social democrats, after their catastrophic results, should have been trying to sort out their problems, but while the party base has been demanding investigation into the problems and possibly changes to the basic outlines of party politics, it seems that the party leaders have been mostly concerned with keeping their positions and preserving the status quo.
This party has a serious problem and I'm curious of whether they'll find a way out of the mess they've created for themselves.
Well, so much for personal reactions from me to the new government. Not as informative as it might be, but all I can do at the moment.  |
|
 |
Just 'cos I like this pic so much.
(Thanks to Rowan for taking it. )
Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.
(LOTR, the musical)
...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion
(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
My new food & restaurant blog
 |
|
|
|
|
Storyteller
Ranger of the North
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 4437
|
Posted: Tue Nov 3, 2009 1:09 pm |
     |
|
Oh it's been a long time since I've posted in this thread!
The most focused-on subject in Israel right now is the Usherenko family murder.
Six members of a Russian immigrant family were brutally- and professionally- massacred in Rishon Lezion several weeks ago. The police has recently nabbed the murderer- Demian Karlik, a former head waiter in the restaurant owned by the Usherenko family who was fired two years ago for stealing crates of vodka. This is considered the worst multiple homicide in Israel's entire history. Karlik is not only unrepentant, but boastful about what he did, and he reportedly doesn't understand why such a fuss is being made about the murder of children. Russian language websites have reported that Karlik is in fact a Russian mafia hitman wanted by the Interpol, and who emigrated to Israel under false pretenses.
One of the thing being discussed is whether such a crime warrants the introduction of death penalty. Israel currently has no death penalty de-facto; it exist as a theoretical possibility for crimes such as genocide and treason in wartime, and only one man- Nazi criminal Adolf Eichmann- was executed. However, many people- Russian immigrants especially- feel that life sentence is too mild a punishment for crimes such as this, especially when the perpetrator is completely unconcerned about what he has done.
The other part of the debate is about immigration. Some politicians and newspapers have suggested that it is time to tighten the immigration laws and to introduce thourough mandatory background checks for immigrants. Some even suggested that the Law of Return should be revised so that citizenship isn't given automatically but after five years. How that would help curb violent crime is beyond me. The Knesset members of Russian origin criticized these suggestions as a "witchhunt" against Russian immigrants in general. There's probably some truth to it, but it's not an entirely fair claim either. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lord_Morningstar
Mariner
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 01 Sep 2010
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7417
Location: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Nov 3, 2009 9:14 pm |
     |
|
Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard was today attacked by a shoe-thrower. Does the man have to follow George W. Bush's lead in
everything
?
Quote:
Student hurls boot at John Howard
12:00 AEST Wed Nov 4 2009
Former prime minister John Howard has become the latest victim of a shoe-throw attack after a Cambridge University student hurled a work boot at him.
The unidentified man threw the Doc Martin shoe just moments after Mr Howard began his speech on "leadership in the new century" for the 400-strong university union crowd last Friday, The Australian newspaper reports.
"Go home, you racist, I am ashamed to be an Australian," the man yelled.
Mr Howard escaped injury after the boot was caught by a cricketer sitting in the audience.
"He threw it with some force but I managed to catch it," Andrew Chapman said.
Mr Chapman was later praised for his ball skills by Janette Howard.
"Mrs (Jeanette) Howard thanked me for stopping the work boot and said 'you must be a cricketer'," Mr Chapman said.
UK police are interviewing the attacker, who was described by witnesses as a white man with a long, blonde-coloured ponytail.
Mr Howard told The Australian the man's throw was "awful" and that he "wasn't as good as the Iraqi journalist", referring to the man who threw a shoe at former US president George Bush.
Mr Howard continued his speech and did not appear perturbed by the attack.
The man was removed from the audience and is expected to be charged with assault.
Officials did not return his boot.
link
|
|
|
|
|
|
truehobbit
blithe and bonny
Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8872
Location: back in the land of make-believe
|
Posted: Fri Nov 6, 2009 4:42 pm |
     |
|
ROFL! Love the fact that 'a cricketer' caught it, as well as that the newspaper thought the brand of the shoe was important.
Ok, back to my own country.
I was wondering if anyone watched Merkel's speech to the US Congress?
I switched on the telly a bit late, but caught the last twenty or so minutes of it.
I thought it was a pretty good speech and I liked seeing that it seemed to have been well received.
A bit odd hearing her warn about the environment when her own government had just decided to let nuclear power plants continue indefinitely, but, well...when you google the speech it's curious that most US papers headline the part where she 'pressed the US on climate'.
A Jewish site focuses on her honouring Holocaust victims, and, personally, I most liked her mentioning that an economy unbounded by law was responsible for today's crisis (a point that didn't earn her as much applause as any of the ones mentioned above, I thought ) - though, to be honest, I couldn't quite follow her reasoning that free trade to developing countries should be of any use to global economic well-being.
If anyone's interested and didn't hear the speech live, here's the
speech in full
.  |
|
 |
Just 'cos I like this pic so much.
(Thanks to Rowan for taking it. )
Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.
(LOTR, the musical)
...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion
(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
My new food & restaurant blog
 |
|
|
|
|
Swordsman_Of_The_Tower
Ranger of the North
Alliance: Rohan
Last Visited: 04 Sep 2010
Joined: 10 Aug 2002
Posts: 2428
Location: North American Empire
|
Posted: Fri Nov 6, 2009 8:28 pm |
     |
|
Felipe Calderon claims the recession is over in Mexico....
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/293450,recession-over-in-mexico-president-calderon-says.html
Quote:
The Mexican economy grew by about 2.7 per cent in the third quarter of the year, marking the end of its recession, Mexican President Felipe Calderon said Thursday. "This figure is very good news because it means the end of recession, of economic contraction in the country," Calderon said at the opening of the Bloomberg Economic Forum in Mexico City.
In the first quarter of 2009, Mexico's gross domestic product (GDP) shrank by 8.2 per cent, while in the second quarter it fell by 10.3 per cent.
The half-year report issued by Mexico's central bank in July estimated that 2009 would end with an overall contraction of 6.5 to 7.5 per cent.
Calderon said his government is working "hard" so that recovery persists. The Mexican economy suffered greatly as a result of the severe crisis in its main export market, the United States, which receives over 70 per cent of Mexico's exports.
"What we expect for next year is that the economy grows by at least 3 per cent," Calderon said.
He noted that he hoped to have 5-per-cent annual growth by the end of his mandate in 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storyteller
Ranger of the North
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 4437
|
Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 6:58 am |
     |
|
It may be a bit random, but is Calderon a common surname in Mexico and in the Spanish-speaking states?
It appears to be quite common among Sephardic Jews. One of my uni lecturers was a Calderon. |
|
|
|
|
|
Jnyusa
Ranger of the North
Alliance: Servant to Galadriel
Last Visited: 04 Sep 2010
Joined: 19 Jan 2003
Posts: 4360
|
Posted: Sun Nov 8, 2009 8:26 pm |
     |
|
From my experience there are quite a few prominent families in Central America who are of Sephardic Jewish descent. They're all Catholic now (nominally), but aware of their Jewish ancestry. |
|
|
|
|
|
Storyteller
Ranger of the North
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 4437
|
|
|
|
|
Swordsman_Of_The_Tower
Ranger of the North
Alliance: Rohan
Last Visited: 04 Sep 2010
Joined: 10 Aug 2002
Posts: 2428
Location: North American Empire
|
Posted: Mon Nov 9, 2009 8:12 am |
     |
|
Jnyusa said:
From my experience there are quite a few prominent families in Central America who are of Sephardic Jewish descent. They're all Catholic now (nominally), but aware of their Jewish ancestry.
As far as I know, that is true. The name is throughout the Spanish world, Puetro Rico, the Philippines, Peru, California. Spain itself all have/had prominent people with the name. I believe it is generally a "white" name in these countries (I.E, those of Spanish descent, not native or mestizo) But those lines have become more blurred recently, so that doesn't usually matter anymore. But Story, if you have seen it as common among Jews in Israel, it is very much possible it was a common name among them.
So it is very likely that many of the Spanish in the new world/Philippines were Sephardic, they over centuries may have forgotten their ancestry or abandoned it however. (I think now there are like 5000ish Sephardic Jews in Mexico, some minuscule amount)
http://www.nytimes.com/1990/11/11/us/scholars-and-descendants-uncover-hidden-legacy-of-jews-in-southwest.html?scp=1&sq=converso%20new%20mexico&st=cse
This is interesting, I've heard of this before, but it would make a lot of logical sense that a persecuted group would flee to the fringes of New Spain, as New Mexico was so far and isolated from Mexico City, there wasn't much enforcement of anything there. And 1500 families in New Mexico is pretty significant, it was pretty sparsely populated until the 20th century. |
|
|
|
|
|
Lord_Morningstar
Mariner
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 01 Sep 2010
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7417
Location: Queensland, Australia
|
|
|
|
|
Lord_Morningstar
Mariner
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 01 Sep 2010
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7417
Location: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Tue Nov 24, 2009 10:12 am |
     |
|
Update on events in Australia:
For the last few months, the dominant issues have been the Government’s proposed Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme (CPRS) and to a lesser extent, the arrival of several boats of Sri Lankan asylum seekers. Both have proven a huge headache for the conservative opposition.
The current Leader of the Liberal Party, and therefore Leader of the Coalition and Leader of the Opposition, is former merchant banker Malcolm Turnbull. He represents a wealthy and educated constituency in inner Sydney, and is himself a progressive on many issues. He had a successful career prior to entering Parliament, is a millionaire, and was the leader of the Australian Republican Movement during the 1999 referendum on turning Australia into a Republic. He is obviously intelligent and talented, but has shown himself to be impetuous (probably overestimating his own ability and popularity), has made a series of rookie political mistakes, and the Opposition’s performance in opinion polls has been abysmal.
Turnbull won the leadership on the resignation of Dr. Brendan Nelson (who succeeded defeated Prime Minister John Howard) on the slimmest of margins, and he has always been unpopular with more conservative members from less urban, wealthy and educated seats.
The Government is seeking to fulfill its election promise to fight climate change by passing the CPRS before Copenhagen. Due to the composition of the Senate (elected through proportional representation) it needs the support of seven non-Government Senators. So it must cut a deal, either with the Greens, Independent Nick Xenophon and Family First (ie. Christian Right) Senator Stephen Fielding, or with the Coalition. Fielding won’t support a CPRS under any circumstances, and the Greens want a tougher ETS than Labor is prepared to give them. Labor Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is a moderate – he comes from a conservative state (Queensland) and has always preferred a ‘big tent’ approach to government. It’s kept him well ahead in the polls, even if it has frustrated Labor’s left-wing base. So he’s decided to negotiate with the Coalition.
Turnbull is committed to passing an emissions trading scheme in some form, but many of his MPs are climate change skeptics. Of late the anti-ETS forces have congealed around Nick Minchin, the leader of the Coalition in the Senate and Barnaby Joyce, a maverick National Party Senator from Queensland. It looked like the Opposition might get some respite when the boat people started arriving – border protection has always been a strong issue for the Coalition and a vulnerability for Labor. Rudd has taken a hardline approach to the asylum seekers, refusing to let them enter Australia and seeking to have them detained in Indonesia (where they were originally intercepted). It’s a compromise that doesn’t settle the hardliners on either side – the Greens and the Labor left want them let in, the Coalition right wants them packed off back to Sri Lanka and the tough border protection regime of the Howard Government re-instated in full (which was only relaxed slightly under the Rudd Government).
Turnbull was able to make some hay on the issue (although he couldn’t seem to decide whether to attack the Government for being too hard or too soft, so he ended up doing both at different times). But now the deadline for the vote on CPRS is approaching. The scheme itself was already weak to begin with and has been further watered down by Coalition amendments, but it still has the potential to split the Coalition.
At present, the bill is about to be voted on, Turnbull has declared that the Coalition is in favour of it, his opponents insist that it is not and that he misread the mood at the party meeting yesterday, and as a result Turnbull has called on them to
challenge him or shut up
. His leadership is probably already terminal, so he may end up martyring himself on this issue.
So the questions now are:
1) Will the CPRS pass the Senate (Labor has a majority in the House so it's guaranteed there)? If not, will the Government call an election on the issue?
2) What will happen to the Sri Lankans?
3) What will become of Malcolm Turnbull? If he falls, who will replace him and what will their position on the CPRS be? |
|
|
|
|
|
Lord_Morningstar
Mariner
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 01 Sep 2010
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7417
Location: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Thu Nov 26, 2009 5:14 pm |
     |
|
Sorry to just keep making multiple posts, but this has to be the most interesting week in Australian politics that I’ve ever seen.
On Wednesday (Australian time) Kevin Andrews, a former Howard Government Minister for Immigration and Industrial Relations, formally challenged Malcolm Turnbull for the leadership of the Liberal Party. He wasn’t a serious candidate – he had little profile, had no platform besides opposing the Emissions Trading Scheme, and carried heavy baggage from his time in Government. Nevertheless he only lost 48-35. That night, Turnbull gave an impassioned speech, perhaps the best of his career, affirming that supporting the ETS made the most sense from a risk-management position (where he quoted Margaret Thatcher in support) and was necessary to secure Australia for future generations. It was probably a swansong, though.
It was clear at the time that Andrews was a stalking horse, which has just been confirmed now that former Howard Government Health Minister Tony Abbott will challenge Turnbull himself on Monday if the Liberal Party does not cease to support the ETS before then. Abbott, a conservative Catholic, is a far more serious contender than Andrews was. Basically, the Conservative faction of the Liberal seems ready to throw candidate after candidate at Turnbull until he falls. They have to move quickly – the Senate could guillotine the debate (ie. force a cloture in American terms) and vote on the ETS at any time, and there’s enough Labor and moderate Liberal Senators to pass it even without the support of the Greens (who think it’s too soft), the Independents, the Nationals and the rebel Liberals.
In the meantime, a large part of the party base and organization of the Liberals seems to be in revolt, with officials resigning and people sending angry letters to their MPs. A formal split in the party actually seems possible, which hasn’t happened to a major party in Australia since the Labor Party split over the issue of Communism in 1954. It’s all very exciting to watch from the sidelines – who needs sport when you’ve got politics? |
|
|
|
|
|
Lord_Morningstar
Mariner
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 01 Sep 2010
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7417
Location: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Fri Nov 27, 2009 6:39 pm |
     |
|
Turnbull is refusing to change his position or stand down.
I have to say that he’s been a disappointment on the whole as Opposition Leader, particularly to people like me and other moderates who had high hopes for him given his ability. He got himself involved in that stupid plot to bring down the Government and refused to apologise for it, has rarely opened his mouth since he took the leadership except to make bland attacks on Labor and its policies despite claiming at the outset he was going to be constructive, and has mishandled this particular issue badly with his obvious arrogance and ‘crash through or crash’ approach.
Still, what sheer courage the man is showing. He took the position that he thought was right and is sticking to it, even though it must have been clear to him for some time now that he’s destroying his political career over it. I admired John Howard because he was never afraid to take a stand unpopular with his party (eg. gun control) or the electorate (IR Reform, Iraq War) if he was convinced it was the right thing to do, but Turnbull is willingly walking to his certain doom. I can see no way that he’ll survive next week – he’s now enemy number one to most conservatives and they’ll undoubtedly terminate him with extreme prejudice as soon as the party meets on Monday or Tuesday. He’s decided to go down with flags flying and guns blazing.
One final comment I should make is that this isn’t simply an issue of climate change skeptics vs believers – there are some who are opposed to the CPRS because they don’t think it will bring benefits proportional to its costs, or because they want to wait until after Copenhagen to enact a scheme. But there is no denying that the heart of the opposition to the ETS from the right in based in denialism. Senator Minchin, the de facto leader of the anti-Turnbull forces, said in a speech to the Senate that Carbon Dioxide is not a pollutant.
In related news, half of the Shadow Cabinet has resigned. |
|
|
|
|
|
truehobbit
blithe and bonny
Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8872
Location: back in the land of make-believe
|
Posted: Sat Nov 28, 2009 12:16 pm |
     |
|
Over here, the one-month-old cabinet has already had its first scandal and turnover.
A few months ago, the German military in Afghanistan blew up a couple of trucks that had been stolen by the Taliban. Over a hundred civilians are said to have been killed in the operation.
Even at the time, the operation drew a lot of criticism, with opponents of the Afghanistan mission criticising the civilian losses and supporters stressing the necessity of the operation and pretty much denying the losses.
Now Germany's leading tabloid (of all media ) somehow got hold of video and other material documenting the civilian losses.
As a result, Minister of Defense Guttenberg fired the army's 'General Inspector' (no idea how to properly translate the title, it's the highest post in the German military, apparently) and the state secretary of defense.
The then Minister of Defense (Minister of Employment in the new cabinet) was stalling, saying he had to review the case and admitting that altough there'd been reports he had not read them...but yesterday resigned as minister.
The former Minister of Families is taking his post, while her post is taken up by a 32 year old girl (can't really call her much else).
(Btw, apologies if the names of ministries sound odd, I'm translating them literally, because I don't know if other countries have comparable departments.) |
|
 |
Just 'cos I like this pic so much.
(Thanks to Rowan for taking it. )
Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.
(LOTR, the musical)
...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion
(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
My new food & restaurant blog
 |
|
|
|
|
truehobbit
blithe and bonny
Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8872
Location: back in the land of make-believe
|
Posted: Sun Nov 29, 2009 3:44 pm |
     |
|
Now it's for me to make several posts in succession.
It seems that our conservative party (CDU) has managed to get the editor in chief of one of the two public television broadcasting stations fired.
The Premier of the state of Hesse, Roland Koch, had publicly called for his getting fired. Suspicions about the actual reasons behind this range from the editor being deemed 'hostile' to conservative politics to Koch having megalomaniac ideas about his own role.
Wow, found an English language news report about this:
http://www.thelocal.de/national/20091128-23573.html |
|
 |
Just 'cos I like this pic so much.
(Thanks to Rowan for taking it. )
Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.
(LOTR, the musical)
...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion
(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
My new food & restaurant blog
 |
|
|
|
|
Lord_Morningstar
Mariner
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 01 Sep 2010
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7417
Location: Queensland, Australia
|
Posted: Mon Nov 30, 2009 6:01 pm |
     |
|
(Presumably) one more post on this particular topic.
Today Tony Abbott
defeated
Malcolm Turnbull 42-41 in a secret ballot, becoming the fourth Leader of the Federal Liberal Party and fourth Leader of the Federal Opposition in three years. Immediately afterwards, he called a secret ballot on a motion to ask the Government to defer the ETS until Parliament resumes next year or vote against it otherwise, which was passed 55-29. Unless 7 Liberal Senators cross the floor and vote against the party’s decision, the ETS has been defeated and Australia will not have a scheme to take to Copenhagen as the Prime Minister originally hoped. Abbott has confirmed that the Coalition will have a climate change policy, but not the Government’s CPRS.
I don’t dislike Abbott, but I don’t particularly like him either. His social conservatism I can live with (his critics often refer to him as the ‘Mad Monk’). And he’s certainly intelligent, often comes across as self-deprecting, and there’s no real question of his competency. Still, he’s highly unlikely to become Prime Minister – the Australian electorate tends to be deeply suspicious of ‘God bothering’ politicians, he can come across as prickly and uncompromising, there may be some lingering anti-Catholicism on the Australian right, and most importantly, the Government is simply unlikely to be vulnerable. And the party is taking a big risk opposing the ETS – if the Prime Minister calls an early election it could easily become a referendum on climate change, to the Coalition’s disadvantage. |
|
|
|
|
|
Storyteller
Ranger of the North
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 4437
|
Posted: Sat Dec 19, 2009 2:28 am |
     |
|
So I'm catching up on the stuff that's been happening in Israel over the last month while I was vacationing in Australia. Much of it is, as usual, all over the English-language media, but as usual there are some important thing that aren't. The most recent hot potato is a proposed bill that aims to ban people who aren't citizens or residents of Israel from acquiring control stake in Hebrew-language Israeli newspapers.
The bill appears to be targeting the newspaper
Yisrael Hayom
(Israel Today)- an extremely popular daily that is distributed without charge on more or less every street corner. It's the only newspaper that currently fits the bill, as it is owned by the American casino mogul Sheldon Adelson. There are two versions as for why Yisrael Hayom is being targeted. One is that it is too pro-Likud and pro-Netanyahu; in this context it's worth mentioning that the co-sponsors of the bill are a ragtag team of Kadima, Labor and even Arab parties MKs. Another version is that it is an attempt by the lobbyists for the "traditional" dailies to kill off the upstart competitor; this is reinforced by the fact that the primary drafter of the bill is a close associate of the media mogul Ofer Nimrodi who owns Israel's second most popular daily, Maariv. There's a lot of discussion going on. Some feel that such a proposal would be a step backwards for media freedom and for the freedom of trade; others insist that foreigners taking control over influential media sources and using them for advancing their preferred political agenda is an abuse of press freedom and a danger to democracy.
In other news, the Belgian consulate is about to be kicked out of its building over some NIS 14 million of unpaid rent. The consulate building- an exquisite villa that is one of the finest pieces of real estate in Jerusalem-originally belonged to a Jerusalem Arab, who sold his property to an Israeli Sofrim fund. Belgium refused to recognize the new owners and have not paid to either the Sofrim fund or the original owner ever since. The free ride is about to end, however, as the Jerusalem District court has ordered the consulate to pay rent or face eviction. |
|
|
|
|
|
Storyteller
Ranger of the North
Alliance: default
Last Visited: 05 Sep 2010
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 4437
|
Posted: Mon Jan 11, 2010 4:01 am |
     |
|
Latest Israeli news roundup.
The newspaper war is escalating. Editors of the two big "paid" newspapers,
Maariv
and
Yediot Aharonot
have warned that both newspapers may have to shut down by the end of this year if the free daily
Yisrael Hayom
is allowed to continue to displace them from the market.
(Meanwhile, the Jerusalem Post has taken the opposite approach a while ago and launched its own Hebrew version that is being distributed for free).
A US-based public opinion research company ran a poll among the Israeli Jews about whether they would support a Swiss-style ban on minarets for Muslim mosques. As I predicted in the Swiss ban thread, the majority of public (43% vs. 28%) were opposed. The distribution of votes will probably be surprising to the foreigners, however. The most right-wing groups that one could suspect of harboring at least some hatred for Islam proved by far the most tolerant, with opposition to the ban running as high as a whopping 92% among the voters of the extreme right wing National Union party (which largely represents the West Bank "settlers), an average of 72% among the generally right-wing "national-religious" public, 64% among the Lieberman voters and 68% among the ultra-Orthodox parties voters. The far-left (and usually strongly anti-religious) Meretz voters rejected the idea of the ban by a majority of 68%. The rejection of the ban was weakest among the centrists- voters of the Likud, Labor and Kadima- they were still opposed to the ban but with weaker majorities (41% to 43%).
Pinkhas Wallerstein, the the director-general of the Council of Jewish Communities of Judea, Samaria and the Gaza Strip (translation: the official representative of the "settlers") has resigned after 30 years at his post, which is a great pity. He is a man of principle who did much to keep settler extremists under control.
The Israeli government has
finally
approved the construction of a fence along the Israel-Egypt border in order to prevent terrorist infiltration and smuggling. Not a decade too soon
Israel's High Court of Justice has ruled that route 443 must be opened to Palestinian traffic- a controversial decision with far-reaching consequences. It is also illustrative of the complexity of things that are all too often portrayed in the world media as "Israeli discrimination against the Palestinians".
Route 443 is a highway which connects the city of Modi'in to Tel-Aviv and to Jerusalem, and also serves as a secondary Tel-Aviv-Jerusalem highway which augments route 1. Part of it runs through the West Bank, which is why it was also used by Palestinians as a major thoroughfare between Ramallah and the villages to the southwest of it. Both Israelis and Palestinians used the road freely until the beginning of the Second Intifada in 2000. After that, the Israeli commuters became frequent targets for Palestinian stone-throwers, firebombers and snipers. Several people were killed, and eventually, in 2002, the IDF began to restrict the Palestinian access to 443, instead building three bypass roads- which were not, of course, as short and convenient a route as the 443. In 2006, following the murder of an Arab motorist whom the Palestinian terrorists mistook for a Jew, all Palestinian traffic on 443 was banned.
The decision to bar the Palestinians from 443 was interpreted by various pro-Palestinian groups as "collective punishment", "apartheid", an attempt to annex the area along which the road ran and what not. Some of the pro-Palestinian advocates who were more honest about their underlying motives (like the B'Tselem "human rights group") openly stated that making Israeli traffic beyond the Green Line more secure is itself a bad thing since it "solidifies" Israeli territorial claims in the West Bank. The High Court's recent ruling to reverse this decision have been hailed by many as a step in the right direction, but it also raised a lot of eyebrows.
For one, it comes right after a bomb targeting Israeli motorists was discovered on 443, which doesn't exactly inspire confidence about the future consequences of the High Court ruling. More interestingly, however, the High Court has recently used the restrictions on Palestinian transporrt on 443 as a basis for rejecting a petition by the residents of settlements Dolev and Talmon to open the highway bypassing the Palestinian village of Beitunia to the Israeli motorists. That's right; just as there are a few roads in the West Bank from which the Palestinians are banned, there are also roads from which the Jews are banned, and for the same reason. The Beitunia road was built as a bypass that was meant to reroute the Israeli motorists from the settlements away from the roads used by Palestinians, on which the Israeli vehicles were frequently targeted. Ironic as it is, this detour itself soon became unsafe, and was transformed into a Palestinian-only road, ostensibly for the settlers' safety. A shortcut to 443 was proposed, but as it's construction started it, too, became off-limits to the Israelis. Eventually the residents of Dolev petitioned the High Court with the request to open the Beitunia road, only to be told that even though it quadruples the trip length, the settlers should use 443 instead of the Beitunia road
because it is off-limits to Palestinians and therefore safe
. In this context, the High Court's new decision appears maliciously dishonest: they rejected the Dolev residents' petition on the grounds that another solution was available only to then turn around and take that solution away! In the eyes of many, it raises questions about the judges' integrity and impartiality.
Another concern is that many people from the Jerusalem area who have until now used 443 to commute to work will now shift to route 1 because of the security concerns, and the increased traffic during rush hours will become more than route 1 can handle.
Edit- Almost forgot. The Iron Dome mobile interceptor system that is meant to protect Israeli towns against rockets, mortars and artillery shells has had its first successful test. The speed with which it was developed was nothing short of amazing: the project was only approved in February 2007. The Iron Dome is capable of intercepting multiple projectiles simultaneously; it can also determine which of the projectiles are likely to fall in populated areas and focus only on targeting those, while ignoring the rockets that will fall in open fields. At this stage, Iron Dome is still cost-prohibitive; each interceptor costs $35 000 to $50 000, while the Palestinian Qassams only cost several hundred dollars apiece and a Grad missile used by Hizbullah about $1000. However, this is the first system of its kind, and the costs will certainly go down with further development, plus once the system is offered for export, the profits it generates will go a long way towards offsetting the costs of domestic use. |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
Goto:
|
|
| Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... , 18, 19, 20 Next |
|
|
| The time now is Mon Sep 6, 2010 1:31 am ... All times are GMT - 8 Hours
|
|
| |