Become a Member! Recently Active Topics
The Hobbit, The Lord of the Rings, and Tolkien - The One Ring > Philosophy: Councils of Manwë (Page 19 of 19)
The J.R.R. Tolkien 
Collection
Bored with US Politics? What's up where YOU live? ... «Last Thread | Next Thread»
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto:
...
Jump to:  
Author Message


truehobbit
blithe and bonny


Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8380
Location: back in the land of make-believe
Post Posted: Thu Mar 5, 2009 3:10 am Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Good article on The Times Online today, detailing the extent of the probable loss in historic documents. Sad

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/europe/article5846343.ece

(I have to admit I don't understand it, though - what water? and how can a pile of rubble do so much harm to papers?
I'm also wondering if the emergency measures were done properly, as search for the missing people never seems to have got really underway. Would be so like this city to mess that sort of thing up. Sad )

 

Big Grin Happy Dance Big Grin



A pic a day - project 365, link to my journal


Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.


Smile (LOTR, the musical)


...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion

(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number


Storyteller
Ranger of the North


Alliance: default
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 3484

Post Posted: Fri Mar 6, 2009 2:56 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


The elections and related stuff no longer dominate the headlines in Israel, but the fun continues.

The National Fraud Unit has declared that they have sufficient evidence to prosecute Prime Minister Ehud Olmert for fraud and breach of trust over the 1998 Israel Investments Center affair. Two other indictments are already pending judiciary hearing. (Better late than never, I say).

Yigal Amir, the killer of the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, is making headlines yet again - he has filed an appeal against the court decision to ban him from making phone calls. The ban was imposed after Amir after he gave a phone interview to the media, in violation of the terms of his sentence.

Sallai Meridor, Israeli ambassador to the US, has announced his intention to quit his post, apparently because he believes that "it is fitting and proper that the new Government will have the opportunity to appoint, immediately upon its formation, the man or woman of its choosing as Ambassador to Washington." Less apparent reasons are rumored to involve him being asked by one of the Israeli government officials to leave the room during a meeting with US officials.

Admiral Eli Merom, the Chinese-Israeli commander of the Israeli Navy whose appointment I've mentioned here before, has found himself in hot water after having been spotted in a Tel-Aviv strip club. The media are having a feast, and both the army and the public are furious, since the army officers are supposed to be "role models" for the rest of the society. Two female Brigadier Generals have already spoken against Marom, and many are demanding his resignation or demotion.

(I've mentioned this story to a British friend of mine, and her reaction was: "You have women generals?"

 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give Storyteller a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message


truehobbit
blithe and bonny


Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8380
Location: back in the land of make-believe
Post Posted: Wed Mar 11, 2009 5:06 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


15 killed in a shooting at a school in south Germany today. Shocked

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/7937554.stm


I've thought before that teacher is probably the job most likely to get you violently killed, right after police officer. Bangs Head

 

Big Grin Happy Dance Big Grin



A pic a day - project 365, link to my journal


Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.


Smile (LOTR, the musical)


...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion

(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number


truehobbit
blithe and bonny


Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8380
Location: back in the land of make-believe
Post Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 3:57 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


So, investigators are now dealing with a possibly forged internet 'announcement' of the deed and no end of copycat "pranksters", who think announcing to repeat the events is a fun way to get your school closed... Very Angry
Well, these pranksters, when identified, get arrested and face appropriate punishment - but just how callous and plain deficient in any human sense do you have to be to do such a thing? It boggles the mind. Neutral

 

Big Grin Happy Dance Big Grin



A pic a day - project 365, link to my journal


Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.


Smile (LOTR, the musical)


...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion

(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number

vison
Mariner


Alliance: House of Elrond
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 8317

Post Posted: Sat Mar 14, 2009 5:34 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Storyteller said:

The elections and related stuff no longer dominate the headlines in Israel, but the fun continues.

The National Fraud Unit has declared that they have sufficient evidence to prosecute Prime Minister Ehud Olmert for fraud and breach of trust over the 1998 Israel Investments Center affair. Two other indictments are already pending judiciary hearing. (Better late than never, I say).

Yigal Amir, the killer of the late Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin, is making headlines yet again - he has filed an appeal against the court decision to ban him from making phone calls. The ban was imposed after Amir after he gave a phone interview to the media, in violation of the terms of his sentence.

Sallai Meridor, Israeli ambassador to the US, has announced his intention to quit his post, apparently because he believes that "it is fitting and proper that the new Government will have the opportunity to appoint, immediately upon its formation, the man or woman of its choosing as Ambassador to Washington." Less apparent reasons are rumored to involve him being asked by one of the Israeli government officials to leave the room during a meeting with US officials.

Admiral Eli Merom, the Chinese-Israeli commander of the Israeli Navy whose appointment I've mentioned here before, has found himself in hot water after having been spotted in a Tel-Aviv strip club. The media are having a feast, and both the army and the public are furious, since the army officers are supposed to be "role models" for the rest of the society. Two female Brigadier Generals have already spoken against Marom, and many are demanding his resignation or demotion.

(I've mentioned this story to a British friend of mine, and her reaction was: "You have women generals?"


Oh, Storyteller.

I thought the strangest thing I ever heard of was a Chinese-Newfoundlander who talked like a Newfoundlander and ran a - wait for it - Chinese laundry. Shocked

But who can top a Chinese-Israeli naval commander with a penchant for watching civilian gals take their clothes off? While I am not myself a big fan of strip clubs, it seems to me that the naval guys I knew in days of yore would be rather proud of an officer with such manly tastes. And the rest of us, we non-military types, we don't expect these guys to be role models "for society". what? I expect that some men, particularly men who spend their days doing military stuff, are prone to engaging in risque rather than risky behavior.

Tempest in a teapot.

 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give vison a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message

Lord_Morningstar
Mariner


Alliance: default
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7116
Location: Queensland, Australia
Post Posted: Sat Mar 21, 2009 4:31 am Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Anna Bligh’s Labor Government has (against expectations) been comfortably returned in Queensland, still holding 56 of 89 seats. Pauline Hanson’s political career is over – she only won about 20% of the vote in the seat she ran in.

I still think it all goes back to Peter Beattie, Premier from 1998-2007. He must be just about the best politician I’ve ever seen. Queensland was virtually a conservative fiefdom for decades, and in the space of about three years he completely and utterly destroyed conservatism as an organised political force in Australia’s most conservative state. It would be like a Liberal Democrat running for office in Texas, sweeping out half of the Republican legislators and replacing them with abortion, gun control and gay marriage advocates. Since the 2001 wipeout, the conservatives have doubled the number of seats they hold in the state parliament, but it still hasn’t bought them anywhere near government.

It’s also notable for being the first time that a woman has led a party to an election victory at a state level in Australia. It also saw the defeat of Australia’s last One Nation Party MP, ending that party’s eventful decade-long history.

 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give Lord_Morningstar a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message


truehobbit
blithe and bonny


Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8380
Location: back in the land of make-believe
Post Posted: Sat Sep 26, 2009 5:28 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Wow, I dug this up from the third page - no posts since March.
Looks like we haven't been bored with US politics since the new presidency got under way... Laughing
Wink

Bumping this, because we're having a general election tomorrow, so here's a bit about the current political situation in Germany and the outlooks and problems for this election.

The current government, under the direction of Chancellor Angela Merkel (CDU), is a coalition between conservatives (CDU) and social democrats/labour (SPD). These being the two major parties in this country, this is called a 'grand coalition'.

We're having a grand coalition because for some time now, either in general or local elections, none of the great parties has been getting a decisive enough majority to rule even with the help of a minor party.

Merkel is standing for re-election, and up until a few weeks ago it looked as if none of the two parties was making any particular effort in campaigning because seemingly even they themselves were taking it for granted that the grand coalition should be continued.

All of a sudden now, though, they have officially announced they don't want to continue in coalition, with the CDU announcing it was going for a coalition with the free trade capitalists (FDP).

This seems to show a sudden confidence in material gains for the FDP, which I personally find scary. (They usually hover around 10%.)

SPD can traditionally go into coalition with the Greens, but no one really seems to expect this to be enough (strange, really, as Greens tend to be about as strong as FDP and SPD as strong as CDU - so, in a way, they are just a lot less confident than their opponents, and that is a bit worrying, too) - anyway, they seem to assume a third coalition partner would be needed, and they have a problem there.

With SPD, just like British Labour, having made a development away from their traditional "workers' interest party" to a more centric position, the gap on the left has been filled by a new party that goes by the telling name "The Left". They want financial security for the poor by charging the rich, which sounds good so far (to my mind), except that they do use communist catchwords a bit too often to be trusted. Initially derided and decried, therefore, as the party of those hopeless die-hards who want the former East German system back, this party has made great gains in votes in a short time, making established parties re-think their initial disdain, and SPD has had to change its mantra from "absolutely no co-operation with "The Left" ever!" to something more like "um, yeah, maybe, dunno, we'll see".

An undecidedness which I have to say hasn't made a very good impression on me. Added to that, they decided on a candidate for the chancellorship who seemed to be a big nobody. Franz-Walter Steinmeier, though having a lot of merits from a long political career of course, has never been someone to have been particularly noticeable before having been put forward as a candidate. It's really only been in last few weeks that you might have started thinking "hey, he talks !"

Some main problems facing the new government are really not so much the current economic crisis (though made worse by it, of course), but a bunch of basic internal problems that have been riddling politics for something like a decade now. Problems that each new government tried to solve with some reform or other, which only seems to have led to making the problem worse, including health insurance, pension funding, the tax burden and unemployment aid.

So, confidence in the big parties is as low as it can get, reflected also in the results of the previous general election, that had CDU at 35%, SPD at 34%.
FDP had 10%, Greens 8% and The Left 9%. (Numbers rounded).

If recent local elections are anything to go by, this trend is still continuing, so if not another grand coalition there'd have to be one of three parties.

I think Merkel has done a fairly good job, and especially abroad has been successful enough. Her new-found love for the FDP, though, makes me wonder what we'd be in for. The most worrying aspect about this is that both support continuing using nuclear energy.

As far as I'm concerned, none of them addresses any of the problems that concern me most closely (with conservatives working mostly for the benefit of families with kids, capitalists for that of businesses, socialists for those of workers and greens for those of immigrants), so I guess whoever I vote for doesn't make much of a difference for me. Big Grin

Participation in the election will be interesting, too.

 

Big Grin Happy Dance Big Grin



A pic a day - project 365, link to my journal


Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.


Smile (LOTR, the musical)


...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion

(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number


elfshadow
Stop, hey, what's that sound? Everybody look, what's going down?


Alliance: House of Gilgalad
Last Visited: 16 Nov 2009
Joined: 19 Dec 2003
Posts: 13495
Location: C to the olorado
Post Posted: Sun Sep 27, 2009 7:55 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


I've been reading some articles about the German elections, Hobby, so I'm glad you decided to post on it! I'm getting so tired of US politics (and I'm an American) so it's really interesting to learn about another country's elections--and Germany's are so important.

If you wouldn't mind, do you think you could delve a little bit more into the political leanings of each of the major parties? It's hard to know exactly how "right" one of your parties are, since I think the US tends to be more conservative overall so "right" and "left" have slightly different connotations.

What do you think would be the ideal government for Germany?

Apologies for this American's ignorance of German politics. Razz

 

Thank you to my TORC angel! Angel Smile



Artwork by Ora Moon
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail AIM Address Yahoo Messenger


truehobbit
blithe and bonny


Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8380
Location: back in the land of make-believe
Post Posted: Mon Sep 28, 2009 12:57 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Election results (rounded again, can't be bothered with the commas as long as they don't make a decisive difference Wink ):

CDU: 34% (second lowest result ever)
SPD: 23% (an all-time record low)
FDP: 15%
Greens: 11%
Left: 12%

Participation was at a record low at 72%.

Merkel will continue as chancellor, this time in coalition with the liberals.

So: Shocked Neutral Rolling Eyes Bangs Head Shocked


elsha, thanks! And your questions don't sound ignorant at all. Besides, I'm rather ignorant about the US system myself, so I can't do too much comparison, I'll just try to describe things as they are here. Big Grin
(From my own perspective, of course, and without claiming completeness. Smile )

You're quite right about the US being more conservative, I think. Your 'socialist' president is about as socialist as our chancellor, who belongs to the conservative party. Razz

So, basically, we have two main parties, too.

The Social Democratic Party (SPD) dates back to the mid-19th century. Workers, then largely without rights, combined to stand up for their rights following socialist ideas.
Traditionally, then, this party stands for
- protecting workers' rights against employers
- imposing government checks on businesses
- legislating social aid and welfare services
- equal opportunities irrespective of birth, wealth, gender etc

Since the 1990s, this party has re-defined itself along the lines of Blair's Labour party in the UK. It seemed at the time that the concept of the "worker" as it had existed in the 19th century was dying out, and that we'd soon all be highly skilled employees in the service industry, and that "flexibility" was the magic word to create well-being for everyone, which of course means giving more leeway to entrepreneurs' ideas at the expense of the classic state-regulation.


The Christian Democratic Union (CDU) was founded right after the war, but could be said to be based on a 19th century party called "Centre", which as the name says, wanted to represent the citizens at the centre of society (in opposition to the socialist workers' representation).
Traditionally, then, this party stands for
- preserving traditional values, e.g. giving preference to standard families as opposed to other forms of co-habitation
- supporting private initiative, from business enterprise to education, which also means leaving more of the social aid responsibility to the individual rather than the state
- making sure that citizens don't feel the status quo threatened
- in foreign policy loyalty to western alliance partners

In recent years, this party has tried to address a wider spectrum of society and accomodate new ways of life in addition to the traditional values as well as reassure the lower classes that individual responsibility is not its only welfare-concept.

Because of that, the two parties have both started to claim they represent the 'middle' of society, and have become almost indistinguishable apart from their stance on foreign politics and some more marginal civic rights points.

This, I think, is largely responsible for the outcome of this election.

As we have a representative voting system, other parties can succeed in getting into 'parliament' (for lack of a better general term) too.

The oldest of the smaller parties is the Liberal (Freiheitlich) Democratic Party (FDP), founded right after the war, too.
They promote 'liberty' in the sense that they stand for
- the state largely keeping out of the private and business affairs of people, i.e. individual responsibility for your own well-being rather than state-regulated welfare and a minimum of legal restrictions of businesses
- personal liberty in choosing ways of life for yourself

In the late 70s, new problems emerged which these parties didn't seem to address properly. To fill this gap, the "Green" party was founded.
They stand for
- protection of the environment
- protection and enlargement of civic rights, esp with respect to immigrants
- new party structures to ensure democracy, as the structures of the classic parties were seen as undemocratic and hierarchic
- no violence
- enlarging personal rights in the sense of abolishing obstacles to new ways of life as seen to be posed by traditional values

After the re-unification, they merged with the East German civic rights movement, changed their name slightly, and strengthened the civic and personal rights and social equality aspects of their program at the expense of the environmental ones.

Lastly, there's a new emerging party, called "The Left". This was created by merging a party that was established in east Germany after the re-unification with the aim to re-instate socialist ideas and a west German party founded by a prominent politician formely of the SPD who left that party when it drifted towards the middle. In its current form it was only started two years ago, and it stands for
- ensuring sufficient welfare and equal chances by taxing wealth, capping income and removing educational obstacles
- regulating businesses to prevent speculation at the expense of employees
- no involvement in foreign conflicts


As can be seen, these are really the original aims of the SPD, which IMO explains the speedy success of this party, esp in a time of economic crisis.


(There are a lot of smaller parties, of course, but they are partly only important locally, partly never make it to enough votes to have someone in parliament, so I'm leaving them out here.)

As to what I'd think would be the ideal government, that's of course a question of my personal political leanings. Wink Razz
Personally, I'm very much for regulating businesses and the economy, and protecting the environment, but I'm also for keeping traditional rules and values. Big Grin

Whatever government we get, though, I hope that our constitution protects us from the market-liberalism that riddles the US economy. There's a paragraph in the constitution that says it's the state's responsibility to protect the welfare of the citizens, so it would be unconstitutional for the FDP to press for abolishing all regulation of the economy. Though it'll be interesting how far they'll go. As far as I'm concerned, de-regulation of the workplace isn't likely to affect me much personally, and if private responsibility is strengthened that might even be good for me as far as pensions are concerned.
The worst threat from the new government, I fear, is to the environment, as plans to end the use of nuclear energy are pretty much scrapped now, and de-regulating private enterprise of course is bound to hurt nature even before it starts hurting people. Neutral

Ah well. Wait and see, eh? Smile

 

Big Grin Happy Dance Big Grin



A pic a day - project 365, link to my journal


Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.


Smile (LOTR, the musical)


...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion

(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number


Democritus
Ranger of the North


Alliance: default
Last Visited: 19 Nov 2009
Joined: 08 Aug 2001
Posts: 4823

Post Posted: Fri Oct 30, 2009 2:19 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


That is an interesting assessment of the German political parties Truehobbit, thank you.
 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give Democritus a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger


truehobbit
blithe and bonny


Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8380
Location: back in the land of make-believe
Post Posted: Mon Nov 2, 2009 3:23 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Thanks, Demo.

Well, the coalition contract is signed, the ministries are all filled, the new government can get started.

When I walked into a local wine shop last weekend where the shop-owner and a bunch of friends were hanging around as usual, I caught someone saying, "isn't it great? A young nobleman to lead the army, and finances is in a wheelchair already..." - loved that. Laughing

Not being the greatest expert in politics myself I have to say that there are a bunch of names filling the offices now that I've never heard of before, and those that I knew took me rather by surprise.

So, yes, zu Guttenberg is changing from Finances, which he'd taken over at the height of the recent crisis, and in which, for what reason I don't know (though maybe because he looks smart and sleek), he seems to have made an excellent impression, getting the highest ratings in opinion polls, to Defense, which, in this country, is not something that is going to win you any Brownie points in public opinion, so I wonder why he wanted it.
He's a member of the CSU (which I didn't mention in my previous post - in Federal politics they are the right wing appendix of the CDU, and the traditionally dominant party in arch-conservative Bavaria).

Finances is taken over by Schäuble, who before had been Minister of the Interior. He's in a wheelchair since having been the victim of an assassination attempt almost 20 years ago. An experience which might well explain and excuse his paranoid attitude to security, but which also, I believe, made him responsible for a number of scary motions undermining civic liberties in this country, and although I don't know what qualifies him for the finance department, I have to say that it's at least a small relief to have him gone from the post of Interior Minister. I hardly know anything about the new minister in that office.

The last choice curious enough (to me) to mention is that of Westerwelle as Foreign Minister.
All through the last decade, he's led the FDP, struggling for its rise to power, and, more often than not, making somewhat of a fool of himself.
I'm not saying he doesn't have what it takes to make a good representative of our country abroad - for ought I know he might - the thing is just that I'm only used to seeing him look silly at the head of a minor party no one used to take particularly seriously.

(Though, hey, maybe dealing with an openly gay foreign minister is going to be something new for politicians of some countries... Wink )

As to the politics decided in the new coaltion:

It seems like the first and easiest thing to be scrapped was the previous government's decision to end the peaceful use of nuclear energy and switch off all nuclear power plants by 2020 - they can now run on indefinitely, having to put some of their profits after that into research on renewable energy and storage for nuclear waste. Bangs Head

Personally, I think, Westerwelle & Co. should by this contract have agreed to have the nuclear waste stored in their own backyard, maybe that might have made them see the problem... Rolling Eyes

Another decision, I have to admit though, is something I completely agree with: the assets you are allowed to retain while receiving social welfare have been raised considerably.

The problem here is that most social welfare ideas stem from socialist and social democratic policies and it seems to be wired into their system that society consists of two groups: the comfortably off bourgeoisie and the possessionless prolatariat. To protect the latter has always been the (laudable) object of the left.

These days, however, we get to see more and more often that people start out comfortably well off and then lose income...
For social democrat welfare ideas, however, you had to fit their image - i.e. be destitute - in order to receive welfare. That's why, in this country, you are not eligible for welfare as long as you have capital assets left.

The fact that these assets might be a person's provision for old age in a time where the state itself admits to not be able to provide for everybody in old age and asks people to take their own steps to secure income in later life hasn't, it seems, struck social democrat policies as a contradiction yet. It used to mean that anyone who takes a fall from financial security to dependency on welfare would be forced to become destitute first, meaning that they would probably remain on welfare in later life.
So, now you are allowed to retain a much larger proportion of your personal savings and receive welfare nevertheless.

There are also some plans on tax relief, but I won't be able to say what I think of these before I find out whether they benefit me personally. Razz

In foreign policy, the government is intent on fulfilling its obligations to its alliance partners, which, first and foremost, means staying involved in Afghanistan.
This is an unpopular thing over here, but, personally again, I think it's the right thing to do. I don't know why things are so messed up in that conflict, or whether there's any chance at all to win it, but I do think that as Germans in particular we have a moral duty to help eradicate this renewed dictatorship of inhumanity and depravity.


The social democrats, after their catastrophic results, should have been trying to sort out their problems, but while the party base has been demanding investigation into the problems and possibly changes to the basic outlines of party politics, it seems that the party leaders have been mostly concerned with keeping their positions and preserving the status quo.
This party has a serious problem and I'm curious of whether they'll find a way out of the mess they've created for themselves.

Well, so much for personal reactions from me to the new government. Not as informative as it might be, but all I can do at the moment. Smile

 

Big Grin Happy Dance Big Grin



A pic a day - project 365, link to my journal


Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.


Smile (LOTR, the musical)


...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion

(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number


Storyteller
Ranger of the North


Alliance: default
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 3484

Post Posted: Tue Nov 3, 2009 1:09 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Oh it's been a long time since I've posted in this thread!

The most focused-on subject in Israel right now is the Usherenko family murder.

Six members of a Russian immigrant family were brutally- and professionally- massacred in Rishon Lezion several weeks ago. The police has recently nabbed the murderer- Demian Karlik, a former head waiter in the restaurant owned by the Usherenko family who was fired two years ago for stealing crates of vodka. This is considered the worst multiple homicide in Israel's entire history. Karlik is not only unrepentant, but boastful about what he did, and he reportedly doesn't understand why such a fuss is being made about the murder of children. Russian language websites have reported that Karlik is in fact a Russian mafia hitman wanted by the Interpol, and who emigrated to Israel under false pretenses.

One of the thing being discussed is whether such a crime warrants the introduction of death penalty. Israel currently has no death penalty de-facto; it exist as a theoretical possibility for crimes such as genocide and treason in wartime, and only one man- Nazi criminal Adolf Eichmann- was executed. However, many people- Russian immigrants especially- feel that life sentence is too mild a punishment for crimes such as this, especially when the perpetrator is completely unconcerned about what he has done.

The other part of the debate is about immigration. Some politicians and newspapers have suggested that it is time to tighten the immigration laws and to introduce thourough mandatory background checks for immigrants. Some even suggested that the Law of Return should be revised so that citizenship isn't given automatically but after five years. How that would help curb violent crime is beyond me. The Knesset members of Russian origin criticized these suggestions as a "witchhunt" against Russian immigrants in general. There's probably some truth to it, but it's not an entirely fair claim either.

 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give Storyteller a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message

Lord_Morningstar
Mariner


Alliance: default
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7116
Location: Queensland, Australia
Post Posted: Tue Nov 3, 2009 9:14 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Former Australian Prime Minister John Howard was today attacked by a shoe-thrower. Does the man have to follow George W. Bush's lead in everything ?

Quote:

Student hurls boot at John Howard

12:00 AEST Wed Nov 4 2009

Former prime minister John Howard has become the latest victim of a shoe-throw attack after a Cambridge University student hurled a work boot at him.

The unidentified man threw the Doc Martin shoe just moments after Mr Howard began his speech on "leadership in the new century" for the 400-strong university union crowd last Friday, The Australian newspaper reports.

"Go home, you racist, I am ashamed to be an Australian," the man yelled.

Mr Howard escaped injury after the boot was caught by a cricketer sitting in the audience.

"He threw it with some force but I managed to catch it," Andrew Chapman said.

Mr Chapman was later praised for his ball skills by Janette Howard.

"Mrs (Jeanette) Howard thanked me for stopping the work boot and said 'you must be a cricketer'," Mr Chapman said.

UK police are interviewing the attacker, who was described by witnesses as a white man with a long, blonde-coloured ponytail.

Mr Howard told The Australian the man's throw was "awful" and that he "wasn't as good as the Iraqi journalist", referring to the man who threw a shoe at former US president George Bush.

Mr Howard continued his speech and did not appear perturbed by the attack.

The man was removed from the audience and is expected to be charged with assault.

Officials did not return his boot.


link

 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give Lord_Morningstar a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message


truehobbit
blithe and bonny


Alliance: The Shire
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 18 Apr 2002
Posts: 8380
Location: back in the land of make-believe
Post Posted: Fri Nov 6, 2009 4:42 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


ROFL! Love the fact that 'a cricketer' caught it, as well as that the newspaper thought the brand of the shoe was important. Laughing


Ok, back to my own country. Razz Big Grin


I was wondering if anyone watched Merkel's speech to the US Congress?

I switched on the telly a bit late, but caught the last twenty or so minutes of it.

I thought it was a pretty good speech and I liked seeing that it seemed to have been well received. Smile

A bit odd hearing her warn about the environment when her own government had just decided to let nuclear power plants continue indefinitely, but, well...when you google the speech it's curious that most US papers headline the part where she 'pressed the US on climate'.
A Jewish site focuses on her honouring Holocaust victims, and, personally, I most liked her mentioning that an economy unbounded by law was responsible for today's crisis (a point that didn't earn her as much applause as any of the ones mentioned above, I thought Wink) - though, to be honest, I couldn't quite follow her reasoning that free trade to developing countries should be of any use to global economic well-being.

If anyone's interested and didn't hear the speech live, here's the speech in full . Smile

 

Big Grin Happy Dance Big Grin



A pic a day - project 365, link to my journal


Sing me a story of heroes of the Shire,
Muddling through, brave and true,
Stubborn as bindweed and tough as old briar,
Never too showy or grand,
Year after year they persevere,
Now and for always.


Smile (LOTR, the musical)


...for man is a giddy thing, and this is my conclusion

(Shakespeare, Much Ado)
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger ICQ Number

Swordsman_Of_The_Tower
Ideas are weapons


Alliance: Rohan
Last Visited: 19 Nov 2009
Joined: 10 Aug 2002
Posts: 1691
Location: Massachusetts
Post Posted: Fri Nov 6, 2009 8:28 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Felipe Calderon claims the recession is over in Mexico....

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/293450,recession-over-in-mexico-president-calderon-says.html


Quote:

The Mexican economy grew by about 2.7 per cent in the third quarter of the year, marking the end of its recession, Mexican President Felipe Calderon said Thursday. "This figure is very good news because it means the end of recession, of economic contraction in the country," Calderon said at the opening of the Bloomberg Economic Forum in Mexico City.

In the first quarter of 2009, Mexico's gross domestic product (GDP) shrank by 8.2 per cent, while in the second quarter it fell by 10.3 per cent.

The half-year report issued by Mexico's central bank in July estimated that 2009 would end with an overall contraction of 6.5 to 7.5 per cent.

Calderon said his government is working "hard" so that recovery persists. The Mexican economy suffered greatly as a result of the severe crisis in its main export market, the United States, which receives over 70 per cent of Mexico's exports.

"What we expect for next year is that the economy grows by at least 3 per cent," Calderon said.

He noted that he hoped to have 5-per-cent annual growth by the end of his mandate in 2012.

 








Maria Maria
She reminds me of a west side story
Growing up in Spanish Harlem
She's living the life just like a movie star

Maria Maria
She fell in love in East L.A.
To the sounds of the guitar
Played by Carlos Santana

Stop the looting, stop the shooting
Pick pocking on the corner
See as the rich is getting richer
The poorer is getting poorer

See mi y Maria on the corner
Thinking of ways to make it better
In my mailbox there's an eviction letter
Somebody just said see you later

-Santana "Maria Maria"
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address


Storyteller
Ranger of the North


Alliance: default
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 3484

Post Posted: Sat Nov 7, 2009 6:58 am Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


It may be a bit random, but is Calderon a common surname in Mexico and in the Spanish-speaking states?

It appears to be quite common among Sephardic Jews. One of my uni lecturers was a Calderon.

 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give Storyteller a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message


Jnyusa
Ranger of the North


Alliance: Servant to Galadriel
Last Visited: 18 Nov 2009
Joined: 19 Jan 2003
Posts: 3922

Post Posted: Sun Nov 8, 2009 8:26 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


From my experience there are quite a few prominent families in Central America who are of Sephardic Jewish descent. They're all Catholic now (nominally), but aware of their Jewish ancestry.
 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give Jnyusa a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message

vison
Mariner


Alliance: House of Elrond
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 31 Dec 2003
Posts: 8317

Post Posted: Sun Nov 8, 2009 8:32 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


What was the word they used in Spain? During the Inquisition? M - something. Can't remember.
 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give vison a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message


Storyteller
Ranger of the North


Alliance: default
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 31 Aug 2002
Posts: 3484

Post Posted: Sun Nov 8, 2009 11:51 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


vison said:

What was the word they used in Spain? During the Inquisition? M - something. Can't remember.

Marrano .

 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give Storyteller a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message

Swordsman_Of_The_Tower
Ideas are weapons


Alliance: Rohan
Last Visited: 19 Nov 2009
Joined: 10 Aug 2002
Posts: 1691
Location: Massachusetts
Post Posted: Mon Nov 9, 2009 8:12 am Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


Jnyusa said:

From my experience there are quite a few prominent families in Central America who are of Sephardic Jewish descent. They're all Catholic now (nominally), but aware of their Jewish ancestry.


As far as I know, that is true. The name is throughout the Spanish world, Puetro Rico, the Philippines, Peru, California. Spain itself all have/had prominent people with the name. I believe it is generally a "white" name in these countries (I.E, those of Spanish descent, not native or mestizo) But those lines have become more blurred recently, so that doesn't usually matter anymore. But Story, if you have seen it as common among Jews in Israel, it is very much possible it was a common name among them.

So it is very likely that many of the Spanish in the new world/Philippines were Sephardic, they over centuries may have forgotten their ancestry or abandoned it however. (I think now there are like 5000ish Sephardic Jews in Mexico, some minuscule amount)


http://www.nytimes.com/1990/11/11/us/scholars-and-descendants-uncover-hidden-legacy-of-jews-in-southwest.html?scp=1&sq=converso%20new%20mexico&st=cse

This is interesting, I've heard of this before, but it would make a lot of logical sense that a persecuted group would flee to the fringes of New Spain, as New Mexico was so far and isolated from Mexico City, there wasn't much enforcement of anything there. And 1500 families in New Mexico is pretty significant, it was pretty sparsely populated until the 20th century.

 








Maria Maria
She reminds me of a west side story
Growing up in Spanish Harlem
She's living the life just like a movie star

Maria Maria
She fell in love in East L.A.
To the sounds of the guitar
Played by Carlos Santana

Stop the looting, stop the shooting
Pick pocking on the corner
See as the rich is getting richer
The poorer is getting poorer

See mi y Maria on the corner
Thinking of ways to make it better
In my mailbox there's an eviction letter
Somebody just said see you later

-Santana "Maria Maria"
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website AIM Address

Lord_Morningstar
Mariner


Alliance: default
Last Visited: 20 Nov 2009
Joined: 11 Sep 2003
Posts: 7116
Location: Queensland, Australia
Post Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2009 8:40 pm Reply with quoteReplyTopBottom


The State Government of Western Australia has proposed new search powers for the police. This caused a fiery debate in the Legislative Assembly, where the laws were compared to those used in Nazi Germany…by an MP supporting them .

Quote:

Last night Liberal backbencher Peter Abetz spoke in support of the legislation and used the example of Hitler.

He said the dictator gained support because he provided people security in a time of anarchy.


He then tried to clarify his comments :

Quote:

Mr Abetz says he was not citing Hitler as an example of effective security, but was merely repeating his German mother's explanation of how Hitler gained the support of the German people.


Abetz was a Reverend with the conservative Dutch Reformed Church before he entered Parliament, and his brother Eric is a Senator from Tasmania and possibly the most conservative Member of the Federal Senate.

To cap it all off, their great-uncle, SS-Standartenführer Otto Abetz, Nazi Ambassador to Vichy France, was imprisoned for war crimes following his capture by Allied Forces in 1945. With a family history like that hanging over my political career I think I’d avoid mentioning Nazi Germany completely…

 

Give a Premiere Membership!Give Lord_Morningstar a Premiere Membership!
View user's profile Send private message
Post new topic Reply to topic Goto:
...
Jump to:  
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 17, 18, 19
  Display posts from previous:      
The time now is Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:06 pm ... All times are GMT - 8 Hours


Terms of Service ... FAQ

Powered by phpBB: © 2001 phpBB Group
Forums Directory